[moneydance] Moneydance 2008 (606) and Compiz problem
William R Wood
w.wood at cox.net
Fri Apr 18 18:21:34 EDT 2008
Dave,
I too would pay $300 or more for a well supported personal finance program
that at least matched Money 2002 feature for feature and had an excellent
interface. I ran MD side by side with M2002 for about 6 months and MD was
so vastly inferior to Money in almost every way that I had to give it up.
The issue has nothing to do with the O/S in my case. I have nothing against
Windows and have no particular desire to use Linux (or a Mac) even though my
son is a Linux specialist at HP and keeps knocking me on the head for not
switching. I simply want a good personal accounting program with all the
reporting features that I need. Money 2002 is very good but it has
limitations and of course MSFT no longer develops it. Current versions of
Money are worse than 2002 and I refuse to use them because they have been
dumbed down and have an automatic expiration of downloading.
I have been following MD for several years and it does not appear to me that
MD will ever approach Money 2002. It may be too much to expect a single
individual who also has a day job to produce a high quality personal finance
program and I agree that an open source bounty is a good idea. Count me in.
Regards
Bill Wood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <dave at davestechshop.net>
To: "General discussion related to Moneydance"
<moneydance-info at moneydance.com>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [moneydance] Moneydance 2008 (606) and Compiz problem
. I would easily pay $300 or
> more for MoneyDance if it at least matched MS Money feature for feature
> and
> had a decent interface. I want a Linux personal finance app that is high
> quality and I'm willing to pay for it.
>
> If enough other people felt like me, maybe we should put up an open source
> bounty to get a solution...
>
More information about the moneydance-info
mailing list